New default signatures

[imported_Atheuz]

I only used default brushes.




The last one is newest.

[myst]

2nd one : The lighting is off, which throws off the whole sig. Keep working on your lighting...

[Vector]

i like the secound one more than the first but neither are bad

[Burnout]

both are pretty good for defaults man

[imported_Atheuz]

Just one thing, both signatures look better on LCD monitors and at 1280x1024 resolution.

[Burnout]

my resolution is 1600×1200 and its LCD

[ion5]

1. the first seem to be like soft abstract, not default...i think i have that brush too
2. is way too huge...is like a banner
3. you have filled the sig with patterns and distract our eyes from the sig
4. a default sig is never filled with patterns

PS: i like the colors on the second1 and the concept

[imported_Atheuz]

Originally posted by ion5@Aug 27 2005, 06:27 PM
1. the first seem to be like soft abstract, not default...i think i have that brush too
2. is way too huge...is like a banner
3. you have filled the sig with patterns and distract our eyes from the sig
4. a default sig is never filled with patterns

PS: i like the colors on the second1 and the concept

[snapback]73220[/snapback]

1. Oh, but I only used default brushes on the first one. It's just a new technique, that I won't slip out to a lot of people. But if you want to know how to make it, then you'll have to contact me.

2. I know it's big, but it doesn't look big on 1280x1024 really.

3. There is no patterns used, only brushes and filters.

4. Look above.

:P