Random Abstractical Sig

**Tim.Leary** · 10-25-2005, 06:41 PM

5 or 6 hours spent on it.
above sixty layers.
Very, very little brushes used (most of which have been extremely covered up).

Criticism/comments please.

**Metal** · 10-25-2005, 06:43 PM

well, tbh, it's pretty flat and depth-less.. shapeless aswell.

**BustA** · 10-25-2005, 07:13 PM

Originally posted by Metal@Oct 25 2005, 11:43 PM
well, tbh, it's pretty flat and depth-less.. shapeless aswell.

[snapback]88386[/snapback]

completley agree.

sorry to be brutaly honest but you could of spent those 6 hours making something much better.

i dont like the colors and the light bit on the right, its way to bright. to overdone, isnt pleaseing to the eyes.

4/10

**Tim.Leary** · 10-25-2005, 07:36 PM

Originally posted by BustA@Oct 26 2005, 12:13 AM
sorry to be brutaly honest but you could of spent those 6 hours making something much better.

4/10

[snapback]88411[/snapback]

My intentions weren't exactly to please everyone. In fact, they were pretty much only to please me. I like the outcome, and it took me that long of a time to get to the outcome.. I'm not saying it's a masterpiece, and I'm not trying to be rude to your criticism, it is appreciated, but I thought I would mention that I dont exactly make artwork so others like it.. more so, I make it as an expression.

btw, God damn you Metal. You posted first on my sig for reasons that you and I only know. why? because you've told me about it. Remember the whole "purity" conflict?

**Lumix** · 10-26-2005, 04:58 AM

I love the spikes.. Make something more defined.. It just looks too random atm.

**Spluff** · 10-26-2005, 05:17 AM

I'll have to agree with metal, though on a lesser scale. It ain't that bad, in my opinion, I love the forms (shapes?) in it. It reminds me of an excavation, for some reason.