0 members and 1,119 guests
No Members online
» Site Navigation
» Stats
Members: 35,443
Threads: 103,072
Posts: 826,684
Top Poster: cc.RadillacVIII (7,429)
|
-
Bored
Did this while i had spare time, :S been wrapped up in coursework and GCSE's so
C&C Please
Thanks
Dan.
-
This is exactly the reason why i hardly come on here any more... everyone elses posts gets comments but ive had 24 views and 0 comments...
-
That's because ur unbelievably noob :') xD
no:P
kinda nice
Favorite:
-
thats czo i wasnt here xD
that a nice tag. i like it how the lightning effects used.
Fur's Gift BOOOO EVERYONE
-
Originally Posted by zole
This is exactly the reason why i hardly come on here any more... everyone elses posts gets comments but ive had 24 views and 0 comments...
mainly cause after every tag you revert back to your old ways.
not to be harsh but theres only so many times i can repeat myself.
The extreme amounts of blackening around the edges need to go they ruin the BG and look lazy.
The extreme amounts of blurring need to go. i don't know what else i can say aside from that. look at your other threads and look at what i said...it's basically the same. :|
nice text.
Edit:
Zole: your a great artist but you really dont ever keep in mind cnc of past sigs when your doign your new sigs.
My DevART
RATCHET is my bitch
Andrew says:
u ever stolen a bible?
Apathy says:
no
used the last two pages to roll a joint though
Andrew says:
wow
thats fucking hard core
^^HAHAHA, dm sucks XD
-
1. the blur was already on the BG of the stock
2. the black is there because the stock wasnt wide enough so i had to blend it some how, i didnt really want to show a clipping mask there to try and make a new BG because it would look strange on the tag. Here are some other tags
-
ok
1st tag at the top: black at the edges = BAD. you can use the smudge tool you know, to blend stocks together, OR you could simply erase the edges of the stock on top to blend into the stock/s behind it. Anything but the black.
I also don't know why you have to do "Smoke that shit" i mean, ok, whatever, im just bein picky but it makes the sig look a little less refined if you get what i mean. Otherwise the text looks ok.. a little big, it looks like its trying to cover something up just as much as the black on the sides is.
Sig 2: much better, i like the effects. Needs some depth imo, the hand seems to be like scrunched up against his body. The text, again, needs some work.
Sig 3: Now, if you're going to use black on the edges, THAT is how you do it. Minimalistic, not distracting and it has some texture to it, looks like smoke. The lighting is a little blunt and doesn't fit the direction of the natural lighting of the render/stock, though the color of the lighting is really nice. The effects on the hands look half-assed, nice concept but not very well executed. Spend some more time on those, right now they just look like a bunch of c4d's slapped on there. The text, baad. Dont let it cover the render, one, and i can barely read it, two. Try the left side of Spidey instead of the right.
Pay attention to your c&c and people might find you worth c&c'ing, just a friendly reminder.
Et Tu?
SilentShadow | Jorrne | Arcmenis | Garis | Splinter | Sanbu | DeadlesS | Tekken | Proflax | Suddu
-
Similar Threads
-
By Skatanic_ in forum Sigs & Manips
Replies: 0
Last Post: 11-30-2008, 08:32 PM
-
By VoodooGypsy in forum The Void
Replies: 3
Last Post: 03-26-2007, 07:58 PM
-
By Tesseract in forum Sigs & Manips
Replies: 3
Last Post: 02-04-2007, 06:16 PM
-
Replies: 5
Last Post: 01-07-2007, 03:59 PM
-
By Runch in forum Digital Art
Replies: 4
Last Post: 11-12-2006, 03:44 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|