New Sig - let me know :)

[Helix]

I've been posting critiques on all of your signatures hopefully you all can give it back to me.



Comments and critique are welcome

[Carso]

Wow, Bro ur signatures are A-M-A-Z-I-N-G! (In bold)
Very dedacatied, and amazing Nice lighting, render Size, Font i cant find 1 flaw no madder how hard i try Amazing! This is why ur my 2nt favorite artist here.

[Helix]

2nd favorite -_-

Thanks for the comment

[Carso]

Ketg is mai favorite D:

[Fork]

I'm not feeling the old English "H" it's a very nice tag overall though I feel the lighting could have been tweaked in a few area's and seems a bit over sharpened and the area to the left of the doll thing is a tag to dark I assume you were trying to cast a shadow off of the doll it's self?

[tits]

The focal looks a bit over sharpened or lq-ish, not feeling the blue gradient, depth is good, lighting is nice, try not to center you focal, the c4d flow/usage is good. Not a fan of the text tho... good stuff man keep it up.

[Helix]

Thanks for the comments everyone

[Ishamz]

Hm agree the focal looks lq, love the lightning and bg, text is cool too
great tag

[DR809]

I feel as if there is unnecessary space within the sig. It is a bit too wide imo.
I love what you did with the text but the overall positioning imo could be lower and a bit closer to the focal so that it doesn't grab too much attention. Maybe Burn the corners of the sigs.
Another thing I noticed was the sharpening of the sig and it's depth. The overall direction of the depth is going great but the c4d behind her could be blurred a bit but not too much.
Otherwise it is a great sig and I'm loving the concept.

[AnthonyE]

I like your depth and your monotoned color, but your text and your render look low quality. I think the render may be a tad oversharpened and your text is a bit too blurry for where it is in the signature. I don't know how I feel about the pixel font sub-text.