Quote Originally Posted by L0neW0lfe View Post
Nature--> You act as if I don't believe in evolution. I believe in controlled evolution which clearly points to a creator with knowledge. I certainly don't believe in evolution controlled by luck that’s just irrational in my opinion. I think both, me and you would agree that every creature has some sort of ability and tool which helps it survive in the environment they live in, was it an accident that different animals in different environments have different tool and ability which can only help them in the environments which they live in?? For example a fish, it has lungs which helps it live under water. How did evolution know that a creature needs a different type of lungs to survive outside the water??, this is why I say that the evolution is controlled.
No shit evolution is controlled. But not by an intelligence.

I find it funny that people always think evolution is "blind luck". It's not. It's natural selection. There is a difference. And if you disagree, please give me a rational argument. Let's see... Creature gains a genetic mutation. This mutation either helps it or doesn't. It doesn't, the creature goes... If it does, the creature eventually out-produces its ancestors, or simply lives with them.

Quote Originally Posted by Killer
...I mean the chances of life were like what? 1 in a trillion...
Aye. And look at the sky. Oh, how many stars dyu reckon there are in the universe, now? Let's say... I dunno... 1 000 000 000 000 000? That's pretty conservative... Now, Let's say 0.1% of stars develop planets? That still leaves, what, 1 000 000 000 000 stars... And then maybe only 0.1% of those stars have planets that fall within the correct orbit for them to possibly develop life? Oh, look, 1 (short) billion stars left... Quite a good chance of life to develop, don't you think? The actual chances might have been smaller. The original number of stars is probably considerably larger.