0 members and 3,883 guests
No Members online

» Site Navigation
» Stats
Members: 35,442
Threads: 103,075
Posts: 826,688
Top Poster: cc.RadillacVIII (7,429)
|
-
08-19-2006, 05:34 PM
#241
good colours, and i nice kinda gradient
its cute, dont like the text though, piel text lok ugly to me
ima say about 7.5/10
-
08-20-2006, 06:45 PM
#242
Looks pretty simple, kinda boring.. i like how the fingers are around the G though.
-
08-20-2006, 06:58 PM
#243
I quite like it. Just seem weird, colours don't fit too well And i don't see the point of trying to blend a render into digital colours. Looks strange
-
08-21-2006, 02:14 AM
#244
very sexy but i hate the greyish blobs and shapes on the right. Left is sex though.
This is me.
-
08-22-2006, 09:52 AM
#245
very abstract, awesome balance of color and good use of negatice space... always a challenge to rate vermillion's stuff because its good.
-
08-22-2006, 10:36 AM
#246
hmm... nice link...
10/10
-
08-23-2006, 06:13 PM
#247
Pretty cool how the back is blurry, and the front isn't. the boreder is pretty cool. the text could be better.
-
08-23-2006, 06:37 PM
#248
sexy 
8/10
-
08-23-2006, 06:39 PM
#249
I love Henry = 1000/10
Other = It could use a lil more shading, mebbe in teh flowers or the book a lil but still kickass man!
-
08-23-2006, 07:04 PM
#250
Hmm it's pretty nice but.. over colour balanced, and the stock is blended way too much into the bg. I don't get why people insist on blending, real people aren't blended, so if you're using a photo in a signature there's really no need to blend it. But i like it, some more on the highlights would be good it's very mid-dark tone.
Similar Threads
-
By SgtSwabs in forum The Void
Replies: 16
Last Post: 12-06-2005, 08:42 PM
-
By LunarPoet in forum Sigs & Manips
Replies: 1
Last Post: 06-23-2005, 12:31 PM
-
By Xavier in forum Sigs & Manips
Replies: 8
Last Post: 06-03-2005, 01:46 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|