Rate the signature above you.

[Apprentice.]

8/10 i like the flow of it not much else i can say

[gfx-v.PMI]

^Pretty good sig. Needs some blending, as the render cutout shows a bit of choppyness on the edges outlines. But, its clean and crisp in appearance, nonetheless.

Rated: 5/10, High Novice - Moderate sig.

[-NuKe-]

10/10

Love decks.

[phantamines]

an excellent photograph. while some may say that you didnt do much, sometimes you dont have to. the text pertains to the sig, and your message. tezt is a bit blurry, but doesnt detract overall. i would say get rid of the border on it tho.

9.65/10

ps - have you thought about adding some blur on it, like a focus blur? might look good.

[jeebin]

like i've said before too dark

6/10

[Nightfire]

[First] There's to much negative space. The text is layed out real well. I like the idea for the light source but it's not strong enough.

It's just a bit to empty.

Your second sig I already commented on and I still think it's good but Iwish the splatter brushes were blured as I mentioned.

[Dale]

I like, dale likes alot Nice look to it alll, very swish

[dragoneye]

Weird&Unique o.O i like it tho ^^ the left side looks like teeth.

[phantamines]

Woah, a sig that not only looks good, but has something to do with thier username? Amazing! Ok, sarcasim aside, this is a very clean sig. The cutout isnt the best, but then its a complex shape, so its as good as its going to get. The actual sig looks great, everything flows nicely. Text is good too (i love the cutout there). Even though ive been looking at it for a while, i still like it alot. the only thing i would be is maybe play with the contrast (i like heavy contrast).

9.82/10

[Henry]

very over contrasted, but i like the shiny, glowy ness of them :P