Rate the signature above you.

[Henry]

Allright I give up...duidelik is die 16 jarige Suid Afrikaanse boere seun nie so goed soos julle nie...jammer jammer...9.9/10

say whaaaat...

[SgtSwabs]

Basaically I have to agree with what Henry said :/


EDIT: oh fuck what new page!? xD

Anyway, Henrys' sig is hawt and always will be hawt. Good use of lighting, brushing and text ect.

3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375 10582097494459230781640628620899862803482534211706 79 / Pi

[Henry]

NICEEEEEEEEEEEEEE PIE!!
I dont like this sig compared to your others, its kinda confusing, dont really like the stock or text
the light source is really bright, but the lighting is good.
1108415+1294(1/2+-59/100)/1.49(13-18x15)

[Chivalry]

Hawtness, Love the vectoring around the stock (how the hell are you supposed to know what the rating is :P)

sin(7/9)cos(5/9)+csc(75)(cot(32) / cot(25)sec(67)+tan(25)^2

[Henry]

i like it, very creative, very well done, love the checker pattern in the back.
dont like - the transparentness of the girl
overall rating-
1000000000x14-[-100]/184912378509172598x12395801235809123850(Z-[-145])

[Nephilim]

Wouldnt you like to know...

[SgtSwabs]

Same as before.

[Horus]

um, lacking depth and kinda repetitive
its okay, not my fav though
id prolly give it a 6.5/10

[mannos]

the vector is really nice, but i dont think i like it as a sig.
imo, to make it look better i think you should change the background colour from gray to something brighter, and more colourfull. and make the text stand out a bit more
7/10

[Nephilim]

It look allright, not 3d enough I think, but still, 8/10