Rate the signature above you.

[Tooms]

Love them both.

first one has awesome depth and contrast. Great text as well. 9/10

Like the background and grunge look of this one. 7.5/10

[Pet]

I am going to go with ~8.2/9

The colors [or lack there of] really works well, and the effects are nice.

[SickSan]

i like the randomization
8/10

[Bloodtears]

1st one, hmm.. about 8/10 dno why, just kinda like it :P

2nd one.. hmmm. not my style.. about 5/10 ..soz, someone else may like it :P
again.. not my style..

[ratchetnclank]

wolf one 9/10 very well blended and has great lighting.
gorrilaz 8/10 well blended ect, but a little to much light on left hand side.

[Papa]

We should get this thread movin again.

Latest: 7/10 - The duplicate on the left is very distracting, and the text is distracting as well. However the BG is very good, nice and intense. It could use more depth however.

Greatest: 7ish/10 - The bg is very flat looking. It needs a lot more depth or something. The blending is great. The text needs some work as it is very distracting. I would try to stick with defaults, like you did in your latest sig. It worked out pretty well. COlors are nice.

Keep going at it. I see significant improvements in your latest sig.

[Tooms]

pretty cool

7/10

[Garis]

I like the first one I would use other gradient map, i am not the fan of colors like those, but anyway it looks nice, 7,5/10

I am not the fan of second one. nice effects here. the text not bad too.. but i dont like the BG... 5,5/10

[SickSan]

7/10, i like those effects you used on it
6/10 good, but the colors dont really go :\

[Garis]

Thanks
You too really need work on those ones...

Maybe I give 5,5/10 for both