new sigga

[Archangel]

it is a simple type writter effact on a basic sig.

[Chucks]

Didn't you post this signature for CnC's already?
Nevermind, I'll do it again. Render looks really stretched and it needs blending in, right now it looks as if it doesn't belong there.
The text is fine but it looks too big and I don't like how it goes over the render. BG looks boring as well...Nice try though

[P.I.M.P]

1 thing. Animation sucks (generally). Other than that, it looks like you'll get better if you practice. Oh and try something diferrent with text (same text in current and this sig). And work on your blending. All the blending. Blend bg with render with text with effects etc.

[Archangel]

well i might to put up this one sorry

[Chucks]

Oh okay. That's better than the one you posted on top. The render's blended in so good job. One thing I would work on now is the BG. It looks really boring to me (All the BG's in your signatures included) it doesn't have that special thing in it, get what I mean?
Text kills it too, doesn't fit with the signature. I suggest you go look at some text tutorials. Keep trying

[Walsh]

i like the first posted one, accept the animation, that one at the top looks better than most yoru stuff, your getting there!

[dgentz]

your 2nd one is better imo... your blending is getting better... play around with your BG's a little more and like chucks said the text is kind of just slapped there.. try using methods to blend the text as well... use the tuts... keep goin man

[Lumix]

There's no need to start a poll... Render needs blending.. BG is meh..
Work on it more..