It looks fantastic. Everything from the bottom of the vector to the top of the page is amazing.

I don't like the "vector revolution" and below though. it seems to be just kind of floating there. And although I understand what you were trying to imply with the font you used for "vector revolution" i think it's counter to the point. Vector is suppose to be smoother than raster art, less digital and more fluid. You're moving from a decadent and ornate design into a simple and archaic font that remind me of the old VT100 terminal type days.

It's deffinetly eye-catching. The flow from the top of the page to the bottom of the vector is terrific, but like i said the vector revolution part just seems to be out of sync with the rest in both the flow and the style. I would deffinetly stop and take another look at this, if i passed it on a magazine rack, though.

The black background was a nice choice, it really accents the richness of the decadent vector style. You may want to try a splash of orange or red in the design just to see how it looks.

Overall I think you did a great job, and you should be very proud of it. This deffinetly deserves to be in this forum.

:edit:
Reading over metal's review, he has a point. However, I disagree with it. Yes, most magazine covers have a distinct seperation to show that the cover image is reffering to a certain article. But, I think this looks much better as a single unit. It gives the cover a sturdy feeling, more like a book cover than a magazine cover. Which will cause people to second glance at it. Like I said, the black was a bold move. I like it.