Stalker

[+Josh Fx]

no it's not about being nicer haha. Just about being a bit more positive and helpful XD

See that's what I was looking for in cnc haha.
I originally wasn't going for the c4d effect but after smudging and a few other things I thought that it was the only thing to feel the void that was there. And I was rather please with the effect it brought.

And I don't mind taking steps back to fix up mistakes I missed along the way. But I can't think of anything else to replace the c4d with out it looking too odd.

Thank you for that

[van Zeben]

no it's not about being nicer haha. Just about being a bit more positive and helpful XD

See that's what I was looking for in cnc haha.
I originally wasn't going for the c4d effect but after smudging and a few other things I thought that it was the only thing to feel the void that was there. And I was rather please with the effect it brought.

And I don't mind taking steps back to fix up mistakes I missed along the way. But I can't think of anything else to replace the c4d with out it looking too odd.

Thank you for that

when i said nicer i meant being "positive" and all that jolly stuff :P, and i believe the problem lies with the fact that you tried to accompany the bg in the sig rather then the render, if you understand.

In detail the size is much bigger then it needs to be, because you tried to fit certain parts of the bg in rather then getting the render in. The render is also small for the sig imo...

Would you mind sending me that render, i feel like doing something and ill see what my brain comes up with

[NXWxWolves]

Honestly its not great at all. I understand that you focused on flow and depth, but what about all of the other thing sigs are supposed to have? You can just focus on two things, you have to focus on the sig as a whole. The blending is absolutely horrible, and to be honest the C4D just messes up the sig entirely. The lighting and depth aren't even that great because the BG is so blurred it just looks weird.

The smudging is really bad, I can actually see where you brushed for the smudging. To be honest you need more effects because half of the sig is really blah.

[+Josh Fx]

BAM---->render

Good luck haha

And yeah I get what you mean. haha and I always do my sigs that size so nothing new

[+Josh Fx]

@ NXWxWolves

Ok mate there's more to cnc than saying it's horrible. That isn't constructive critism.
And as for your observations the background was lightly blurred. I said I was working on my depth and flow not just focusing on it. Of course I took into account the whole tag.

I guess good cnc doesn't come around to well here anymore.

[ColdDegree]

it looks as if you were trying to blend the render into the c4d. go with a soft brush and eraser a bit of the edges of the render to better blend it. you can create depth by slighty brushing black on the sides. the lighting is decent but it should near the top right. overall gj kiu

[van Zeben]

@ NXWxWolves
I guess good cnc doesn't come around to well here anymore.

people arent CnC'ing this because there isnt much to CnC

[ColdDegree]

no need to start a flame war

[+Josh Fx]

not flaming just would expect something better than saying it's horrible :S
And I wasn't referring to everyone else dw.

And yeah I'll take this advice on board and post a new signature tomorrow that is hopefully better.
Kthxguys!

[TRUeLM]

I can honestly say that I disagree with majority of the "cnc" thats been posted about this sig. The blending is done well where it is, and the overall concept is nice. The c4d does create flow, and the blurring isn't a problem whatsoever. The colors might be a bit bland, and it does need a better source of lighting, but thats about the only thing's I'd fix on in this.

People seem to lack creativity for some reason - despite this being a graphics forum - and tend not to be able to appreciate something different from the usual. He's asking for cnc, not some nonsense about everything being done wrong.