actualy I respect the jurors in this case a lot. The bottom line is that you are presumed innocent until proven guilty with no reasonable doubt. The credibility of child, the child's mother and the witnesses from Jackson's own staff were all comprimised by other issues which brings into question their reliability and motive.

Regardless of how you 'feel', the bottom line is that the prosecution wasn't able to present any evidence of an offence being commited. You don't convict someone just because you think he must be guilty, you can only convict based on evidence.

And I wouldn't talk too much about his money, it can be said that the posecutor has had a vendeta against MJ, and has done what he has done to financialy punish MJ. I mean lets face it, they tried to drag it out as long as possible, brought up issues that were totoally non related to the charges and thus made MJ spend a fortune in defence costs. Bringing up issues like how he spends his money is a blatent attempt to paint him as weird, but it never had any bearing on whether he is gulity on any of the charges.