GFXVoid Graphic Design Forum

Remove Text Formatting
New [19-01, 18:02] Coconut: Got wished happy birthday yesterday by GFXVoid....damn I'm old
New [31-01, 16:50] Gaaf: We’re all old lol. Love how everyone is still checking in once in a while
New [05-02, 15:05] Chris:
New [02-06, 15:56] cc.RadillacVIII: Glad to see my imageshack hosted smilies are still operational
New [04-06, 22:51] kailu: sure miss this place
New [11-11, 18:12] Skatanic_: Hi
New [18-11, 19:34] Sexercise: Howdy!
New [15-12, 20:24] Scrib: Wow, it’s been a long time
New [15-12, 20:25] Scrib: joined in 09, last post no idea when - hope all the old faces are doing brilliant
New [06-01, 07:04] shiv96: Oi fuckers
New [06-01, 07:04] shiv96: miss this place sometimes, happy new year
New [24-01, 04:42] +Josh Fx: Happy 2023 fuckers
New [25-01, 00:48] Pet: Another year of the void just sitting on a host somewhere.... xD
New [25-01, 04:59] +Josh Fx: GFXvoid will never die
New [25-01, 04:59] +Josh Fx: Not going to lie it'll be a sad day the day I go on here and it's gone forever
New [06-02, 19:22] ColdDegree: Happy 2023 my friends
New [03-05, 07:51] Deadloader: Wow, I have a strong nostalgia for this place. Orange name reppin
New [13-05, 02:23] Viporizer: It's been too long.
New [13-05, 02:25] Viporizer: Aww the board I was active in have not seen an update since 2018... The good days are over I guess
New [13-05, 02:36] +hm.Alucard1973: Hi Hi
New [03-06, 10:33] +s9.Oath: been a long time
New [30-07, 20:34] cC.Agitator: We’re still alive
New [10-10, 02:52] Viporizer:
New [26-12, 13:42] Daemon: Unkillable forum!
New [11-05, 14:42] Derosion: The endless void, still up. Incredible.
New [01-09, 10:10] Chris: Certainly impressive :P
New [01-09, 10:13] Chris: I'm not allowed to make any more forum posts,because my post count is "1,337"
New [07-09, 23:57] Psypher: Wow this site is still up! Hello to the next person that comes along!
New [23-09, 13:51] asdfasdfasdf: Hello, Psypher
New [03-01, 15:50] marioman77: :O

» Online Users: 2,230

0 members and 2,230 guests
No Members online

» Site Navigation

 > FAQ

» Stats

Members: 35,442
Threads: 103,075
Posts: 826,688
Top Poster: cc.RadillacVIII (7,429)
Welcome to our newest member, Lekelindids
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,492

    Default

    I got really bored and I really liked the render from RF Online that everyone else has been using so I figured I'd use it too :P This one actually took me the better portion of 2 hours. I'm still not pleased with it and that kind of bugs me, but I really need sleep so I'm going to bed. Post any critiques you have (other than the fact the render has already been whored to death, that is) and maybe I'll change it around a bit.



    Yeah. :S

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    453

    Default

    They aren't ignored.. they just choose not to reply. I don't like the text, it's a bit boring. The scan lines are too dark, opacity that a bit, and your render doesn't even look like it's part of the signature.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    2,921

    Default

    i think its pretty sweet, and sorry if its ignored, i feel that way too. the scans are really sweey, and i love the color, i have no idea what candy was saying about the render not being part of the sig, i think its fine..

    btw, i dont look at the sigs forum, so dont blame me.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    453

    Default

    What I meant is.. put the render layer below the scanline layer.. so the render is scanlined also.


    BTW: I do like your colors on your signature, their awesome.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    2,921

    Default

    oh, i understand now

    *looks at sig*

    ye, however i thought it looked alright... i duno..


    (candy, stop editing, i have to as well :/ )

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,810

    Default

    I think it looks good, but I would do what Juicy mentioned. I think if you did that it would make it look a lot better, but good job overall man. Sorry if you get the feeling you're being ignored.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    99

    Default

    I like the way you incorporated "Fade: into the arm of the render. Very hard to notice, but I like it.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    470

    Default

    i think it should be called internal conflict instead of conflict within... it sounds more professional.. about the sig.. the brushing seems to fit but yet it doesn't... it fits the title but not the render... cuz the title makes it seem like there is a war going on inside of him... but the render looks subtle and unhappy like he has lost all hope... so therefore the bg should be a little more subtle but still keep the brushing theme of explosions and bursts of light and such

Similar Threads

  1. OMG this took so long!
    By SgtSwabs in forum Sigs & Manips
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 12-30-2005, 03:05 PM
  2. been 2 long
    By RoughDraft in forum Sigs & Manips
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-25-2005, 09:02 PM
  3. Long time
    By lincolnluxor in forum Sigs & Manips
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-09-2005, 09:48 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.1