http://img2.imageshack.us/img2/9994/bradpitt3.png
was for the battle with Asylum ^
started with
http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/16/24200120.png
Brad Pitt
Printable View
-
10-02-2009, 09:17 PMcC.DOMINO™Brad Pitt
-
10-02-2009, 11:35 PMJool
Pretty nice, but next time, choose a higher quality stock.
"If it ain't high quality, it ain't worth it". -
10-02-2009, 11:50 PM.blueflareisnt the point of photoshop to enhance photos? so why not make a bad quality image high quality :3...thats the real skill..Quote:
Originally Posted by Jool
btw good tag, wished it wasnt so centered -
10-03-2009, 12:52 AMcC.DOMINO™
thx blueflare, and jool, ya the stock was a scan from a magazine i think, thats probly why the quality is low, but i did enhance it first before i started working with it to smooth out the bad looking parts and i kept it centered to keep the focal of the flame and light source in the middle, it felt right when i was making it. kinda got inspired by ur works blueflare with all the colors and random lines and such. thx for the comments so far.
-
10-03-2009, 01:02 AM(-)Ion
Agreed on the LQ. Both the effects and stock are low quality. I disagree however on making a point of making bad quality stocks hq. In the amount of time it takes you to do a good job on a lq stock to make it appear hq, you could just find a better stock to start with. Plus you actually have to know what you're doing otherwise it still comes out low quality, on top of that there's only so much you can do with some stocks. Soooyeah go for hq stocks.
-
10-03-2009, 02:49 AMcC.DOMINO™
thx Ion, your point of view always helps, its very constructive to hear someone call your work low quality. that will help me alot. appreciate it.
-
10-03-2009, 12:39 PMShane.
the depth is great
everything is great actually
1 mistake though
the face is blurry dammit'
it woukd of been amazing tag if it was not that blurred -
10-04-2009, 01:44 AM(-)Ion[REMOVED]Quote:
Originally Posted by DOMINO™
-
10-04-2009, 01:54 AMcC.DOMINO™
lol ok man you win I am the [REMOVED]. thx
-
10-04-2009, 02:47 AM(-)Ion
"You're right, i'm sorry. it's absolutely perfect. omg it's lyke uuber pro, how'd you do that? that's more helpful right?"
^^first part of my deleted post
vv other part. not that bad.
sure i'll revise this next part so Nutter doesn't go all Mod on me and erase posts that were completely justified while only warning me. go figure. (by the way i didn't do anything than call him a feminine hygiene product which isn't as bad as a bunch of other stuff that I see around here that gets ignored. but since it's me...uh ohh tsk tsk)
sooo in conclusion domino still quit being the above mentioned. even Jool said the stock was lq. imagine that you didn't have a sarcastic comment for him. the effects and stock are still low quality in my opinion. if you don't want it, then either don't post it, or skip my post. don't cry cause i didn't lie and say it's good. -
10-04-2009, 11:26 AMDom
Ion, I honestly don't see what your problem is.
You critisise EVERYONE's work no matter how good or bad it is and you never post anything of yours up.
I'm sick to death of you and your snipey comments towards peoples tags. Nutter took action, as he should have done and your still baiting.
Do yourself a favour, either start being more constructive instead of saying "It looks messy/low quality" etc and actually give some advice "It looks kind of messy in my opinion, try removing a couple of the C4D's or mess around with the opacity" (You get the idea) or just don't comment at all on peoples tags. Because I would love to see you take all the crap you give people. Your just causing problems that aren't needed. If this continues, further action WILL be taken.
If you have a problem in the future, send me a message.
DOMINO - The tag's not bad, but it's weird. I like the effects around Brad Pitt but then the rest just seems random. I think more could have been done with this. I espically don't like the random dots outside of Brad. Very contrasted and just seem random. I know you can fix this tag up and make it look loads better. Keep it up. :)
-
10-04-2009, 12:23 PMJoolFrankly, it doesn't look very enhanced.Quote:
Originally Posted by .blueflare
-
10-04-2009, 02:08 PM(-)Ionlol you're a trip dude..since when is "it looks mess and effects and stock look lq" not a constructive crit? it tells you exactly what's wrong with it without me having to make you think it's good when it's not, like shane said. why exactly would i post tags here? there's no way i'll get anything constructive out of it. (looks good/cool effects aren't constructive to me).Quote:
Originally Posted by Dom
i'll continue to post and actually help the people here with a little dose of reality and honest crit. as you can see in this thread i wasn't the one who started all of this but am the one getting all the blame because you mods don't like me. frankly i could care less, but i think it's funny that that happens. lol -
10-04-2009, 03:19 PMDom
No, but that isn't all that gets said about tags. If you don't like it, you don't have to stay.
I'm closing this topic. Further discussions can be taken VIA PM.
