0 members and 3,986 guests
No Members online

» Site Navigation
» Stats
Members: 35,442
Threads: 103,075
Posts: 826,688
Top Poster: cc.RadillacVIII (7,429)
|
-
Ion, I honestly don't see what your problem is.
You critisise EVERYONE's work no matter how good or bad it is and you never post anything of yours up.
I'm sick to death of you and your snipey comments towards peoples tags. Nutter took action, as he should have done and your still baiting.
Do yourself a favour, either start being more constructive instead of saying "It looks messy/low quality" etc and actually give some advice "It looks kind of messy in my opinion, try removing a couple of the C4D's or mess around with the opacity" (You get the idea) or just don't comment at all on peoples tags. Because I would love to see you take all the crap you give people. Your just causing problems that aren't needed. If this continues, further action WILL be taken.
If you have a problem in the future, send me a message.
DOMINO - The tag's not bad, but it's weird. I like the effects around Brad Pitt but then the rest just seems random. I think more could have been done with this. I espically don't like the random dots outside of Brad. Very contrasted and just seem random. I know you can fix this tag up and make it look loads better. Keep it up. 
Last edited by Dom; 10-04-2009 at 11:28 AM.
-
 Originally Posted by .blueflare
isnt the point of photoshop to enhance photos? so why not make a bad quality image high quality :3...thats the real skill..
btw good tag, wished it wasnt so centered
Frankly, it doesn't look very enhanced.
Latest:
-
-
No, but that isn't all that gets said about tags. If you don't like it, you don't have to stay.
I'm closing this topic. Further discussions can be taken VIA PM.
Similar Threads
-
By Daemon in forum Digital Art
Replies: 11
Last Post: 03-16-2008, 12:31 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|