GFXVoid Graphic Design Forum

Remove Text Formatting
Loading...

» Online Users: 2,093

0 members and 2,093 guests
No Members online

» Site Navigation

 > FAQ

» Stats

Members: 35,442
Threads: 103,075
Posts: 826,688
Top Poster: cc.RadillacVIII (7,429)
Welcome to our newest member, Lekelindids
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Flame

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    4,831

    Default Flame

    Something New....Inspired mostly by soggy and papa. just random stuff i'm trying out. wat u guys think?







  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    379

    Default

    The flames are cool, but the rectangles in the top right aren't doing too good.

    "Judge a man by his questions,
    not his answers."
    -Voltaire




  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    707

    Default

    Yeah... there's not much flow or popping effects, but as a sig meant just to try out some stuff there are some cool effects in there, just need to emphasize those... if you were trying out different types of text I think the one that you used for your name is the bestest

    gj on the effects tho :3

    Et Tu?
    SilentShadow | Jorrne | Arcmenis | Garis | Splinter | Sanbu | DeadlesS | Tekken | Proflax | Suddu
    -


  4. #4

    Default

    overall its nice, but not sure of the rectangle clipping masks in the top right. likin' the effects though, good job =D

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Near my PC..Lol.
    Posts
    454

    Default

    IMO,I love this sig,the boxes are working ,lighting is good Imo,awesome effects,How did ja make the flame effects,


    PS:THIS IS MY 300


    Go GFX viod!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Vancity, Canada
    Posts
    2,985

    Default

    Pretty cool looking, but I don't really like the boxes at the top. Liking the fire, that is cool, although the one on the right is angled differently then the one on the left and that is screwing up the flow a tiny, tiny bit. Not digging that black text in the middle but the other text parts are good.
    Quote Originally Posted by MarkPancake View Post
    MarkPancake banned.
    Success.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,782

    Default

    I hate that it's over topazed. The flames are cool but the rectangles kill the flow.

    The immortal text is bad to far away from the flame text and it is in the wrong colour. Flame needs some kerning too immortal.

    Little more time with this one imo.


  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    4,831

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tunafish69 View Post
    The flames are cool, but the rectangles in the top right aren't doing too good.
    thanks man...yeah the rectangles were a random addition.

    Quote Originally Posted by Miril View Post
    Yeah... there's not much flow or popping effects, but as a sig meant just to try out some stuff there are some cool effects in there, just need to emphasize those... if you were trying out different types of text I think the one that you used for your name is the bestest

    gj on the effects tho :3
    thanks for the comment
    yeah i like how i did that one too.

    Quote Originally Posted by s0ggywaffls View Post
    overall its nice, but not sure of the rectangle clipping masks in the top right. likin' the effects though, good job =D
    thanks soggy good to see u like it. gotta read that flame tut of urs.

    Quote Originally Posted by Suddu View Post
    IMO,I love this sig,the boxes are working ,lighting is good Imo,awesome effects,How did ja make the flame effects,


    PS:THIS IS MY 300
    thank u sudz...i made it with the liquify tooll...basically a bunch of clipping masks that i liquified.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ptka View Post
    Pretty cool looking, but I don't really like the boxes at the top. Liking the fire, that is cool, although the one on the right is angled differently then the one on the left and that is screwing up the flow a tiny, tiny bit. Not digging that black text in the middle but the other text parts are good.
    thank u ptka....yeah the boxes dont seem to much of a hit..just tried sommin new. thank u

    Quote Originally Posted by ratchetnclank View Post
    I hate that it's over topazed. The flames are cool but the rectangles kill the flow.

    The immortal text is bad to far away from the flame text and it is in the wrong colour. Flame needs some kerning too immortal.

    Little more time with this one imo.
    thank u ratchet....sorry i did get carried over with the topaz

    if u notice tho there is a flame text underneath its a clipping mask so u cant see it:S.

    kerning means:S? i'm still a noob.
    thanks for the tips bro.






  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,782

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Immortal. View Post
    thanks man...yeah the rectangles were a random addition.


    thanks for the comment
    yeah i like how i did that one too.



    thanks soggy good to see u like it. gotta read that flame tut of urs.



    thank u sudz...i made it with the liquify tooll...basically a bunch of clipping masks that i liquified.



    thank u ptka....yeah the boxes dont seem to much of a hit..just tried sommin new. thank u



    thank u ratchet....sorry i did get carried over with the topaz

    if u notice tho there is a flame text underneath its a clipping mask so u cant see it:S.

    kerning means:S? i'm still a noob.
    thanks for the tips bro.
    Kerning is when using the text tool to increase the space between characters you hold the alt key and press the directional arrows on you keyboard, great to get the spacing on fonts just right
    I just noticed that clipping mask :| So i take the distance thing back.
    Nice work on the flames though.


  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    5,091

    Default

    <3 kerning for text. ALWAYS USE IT. I was ripping my hair out the other day when i was making some 3d text and stuff in c4d, because they don't have kerning. YOu beleive that? Retarded.

    Anyways your sig:
    FIrst off the text is brutal. The top flame text looks to me like "lame", i can hardly read the clipping mask. And IMmortal simply looks like "mmortal" The i is too close to the M to see it.
    I would tbh Just throw out the text and retry it. Your usually pretty bomb with it i think your just having a hard time with this sig.

    I'm with ratchet the topaz is annoying. It's a cool effect but whored to no return. It's nice everyonce in awhile but don't use it often, and when you do erase some parts of it, use it kinda like a FIlter>distort>diffuse.

    The actual flames are badass. They are really cool. I like them a lot. They go right up his arm and have awesome highlights and dips and shadows. it looks insane. I like the blue coloring as well.
    I think you just need to dull down the light a bit. it's just too bright!

    Overall though awesome job. You should use a tablet on sigs like these you'll be amazing how kmuch they can help you.


    My DevART
    RATCHET is my bitch
    Andrew says:
    u ever stolen a bible?
    Apathy says:
    no
    used the last two pages to roll a joint though
    Andrew says:
    wow
    thats fucking hard core
    ^^HAHAHA, dm sucks XD


Similar Threads

  1. Realistic Flame Tut
    By xxpunk_rock_princessxx in forum Other Tutorials
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-18-2007, 02:49 PM
  2. Digital Flame
    By Point.44 in forum Sigs & Manips
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-14-2007, 07:34 AM
  3. Flame On!
    By Virus™ in forum Digital Art
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-13-2006, 01:54 AM
  4. Flame MOFO
    By Tenchido in forum Sigs & Manips
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-05-2005, 04:18 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.1